| Ian
Coster |
||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: 07/06/06 Time:23:20 UT Seeing: 3/5 Transparency: 3/5 Location of site: London Lat: 51:27:54N, Lon: 0:16:36W Site classification: Suburban Conditions: High hazy cloud Moon: Waxing Moon near full Sky darkness: Mag4 Sky (ZLM) Telescope: Orion Optics 200mm F6 Eyepieces: 9mm Ortho Barlow: No Magnification: x133 |
Comments Primary Colour:
White Secondary Colour: White
General |
|||
| David
Jenkins |
||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: 12 June 2006 Time: 5:00-7:30 UTC Seeing: <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>: 5 Transparency: <1-10 Scale (10 best)>: 8 Location of site:Orem, Utah USA Latitude, 40.29694. Longitude, -111.69389 Site classification: Utah Valley urban area of 500,000 with strong light pollution due to acorn glass street lights which shoot light up and out – The bane of all local observers. Salt Lake City metro light dome to the northwest at 40 miles. Conditions: Clear, breezy (as can be seen in some of the images), warm Moon: Full moon raising late in observing session Sky darkness: <Limiting magnitude>: 3.5 Telescope: Celestron GPS 11" on APT Wedge Mount: Standard Celestron fork and tripod Eyepieces: Meade Super Plossl – 32mm Diagonal: Yes, Meade 1.25" flip mirror diagonal Magnification: Approximately 350X using Nikon Coolpix 4500 and 4X zoom Software: Reduc version 3.62 – Great software from Florent Losse. S33 group member. |
Distance:
6.2, PA: 307![]() |
|||
| Richard Jepeal | ||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: June 17, 2006 UT Seeing: Vary, from 5/10 to 8/10 (Zenith) Transparency: --- Location of site: New Britain, Connecticut, USA Site classification: Urban Conditions: Sky darkness: Telescope: 8in Celestron Nexstar Eyepieces: Magnification: |
Showcase bluish-white
pair. Webb
has noted greenish in both stars, as do others. |
|||
| William
Schart |
||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: 6/19/06 Time: 10:36 PM Seeing: 4 out of 5 Transparency: Location of site: Columbia, USA Site classification: Suburban Conditions: warm Sky darkness: around mag 5 (LM) Telescope: C8 Eyepieces: 25 and 10 mm Magnification: |
Easy split about 300. White with perhaps just a tinge of blue. | |||
| Tom
Teague |
||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: 2006 June 29 Time: 2230 UT Seeing: 7/10 Transparency: Some thin high cloud Location of site: Chester, England Site classification: Suburban Conditions: Still, warm Sky darkness: Naked eye limiting mag. 3.5 Telescope: 50/540 O.G. (the Agnes Clerke refractor) Eyepieces: 21.5mm Dialsight Magnification: x25 |
On locating Struve 1965,
I could immediately see that
it was double in approximate PA = 300°. I could not clearly
separate the
components, which appeared as a figure-of-eight with no dark
interspace. Both
stars appear white.
|
|||
| Wolfgang
Vollmann |
||||
| Star: Struve 1965 Date: 2006 July 26 Time: 21:00-24:00 UT Seeing: 5 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)> Transparency: clear Location of site: Vienna, Austria Site classification: Suburban Conditions: Moon: Sky darkness: 4.5 <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: 130/1040mm refractor Camera: SBIG ST237A CCD Exposures: 6 or 12 x 10 seconds for astrometry. Distance/PA measurement was done with these images also except where noted (bright stars need shorter exposure times of 1 sec or less) Image measurement: astrometry with Astrometrica software and UCAC2 or USNO B1.0 catalog (see http://www.astrometrica.at); with exact focal length and image orientation I measured distance and PA with AIP4WIN software. I took means of measuring all my images for a star. There is a scatter of 0.2 arcsec in separation and 0.2 deg in PA. Scatter in PA is much larger if the stars are very close. Note: All images have north up Eyepieces: n/a Magnification: n/a |
STF1965 = WDS 15394+3638 Zeta CrB is one of the
finest double star sights at
low to medium power in my telescope! It was not so easy to measure it:
a
separation of 6.2 arc seconds translates to only 4 pixels at prime
focus in my
telescope. So I tried and made image series of 12 each using exposure
times of
10 seconds for astrometry and 1, 0.1 and 0.01 seconds for the distance
and PA
measures. Still the standard deviation in PA was quite large, 3.2 deg,
which is
not unexpected at this separation. ![]() |
|||