Struve 1937, eta Corona Borealis

 
Steve Bodin 
Star: Struve 1937, eta Corona Borealis
Date & Time: 6 May 2003 11 pm to 1 am
Seeing: 4-5  <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. 
Transparency: poor
Location of site: Silverdale WA, USA
47N 123W
Site classification: suburb-rural
Conditions: temp 40F, damp
Sky darkness: 4.5 due moon <Limiting magnitude> 
Telescope: Celestron C8
Eyepieces: not used
Additional: DX-8263SL video camera at prime focus and 3x, 6x
Magnification: app. 333x, 1000x and 2000x
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Star: Struve 1930
Date & Time: 29, 31 May 2003 11 pm to midnight
Seeing:  7->3 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. 
Transparency: fair degrading to poor
Location of site: Silverdale WA, USA
47N 123W
Site classification: suburb-rural
Conditions:  temp 45-50 F, damp
Sky darkness: 5.6 <Limiting magnitude> 
Telescope
Eyepieces: not used
Additional: DX-8263SL video camera pf,  6x
Magnification: app. 333x,  2000x
 
 
 

Star: Struve 1930
Date & Time: 24 June 2003 11 pm to 1 am
Seeing:  7-8/10 -> 4-5/10
<1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. 
Transparency: fair
Location of site: Silverdale WA, USA
47N 123W
Site classification: suburb-rural
Conditions: temp 50F, dry
Sky darkness: 5.6 <Limiting magnitude> 
Telescope: Celestron C8
Eyepieces: not used
Additional: DX-8263SL video camera at 6x
Magnification: app. 2000x 
 

One of those stars that I have been following for many years. Definite orbital motion seen over the last 30 years, but have made measurements for only part of that time. The color is definitely yellow for both stars, but they are joined in a C8 at this time. this needed a stacked 2x and 3x , 6x total, teleconverter to get sufficient image size. Measured, 0.55 sec at 91.7 deg PA, which is near the WDS prediction of 0.548 sec at 91.7 sec. Just lucky that this measure is this close as the poor image could be almost anything!


 







Had a second look trying to split it cleanly, the seeing looked like a 7, but degraded to 5 by the time I got all the barlows connected to make 6x magnification. Still joined at an equivalant 2000x, measurement 0.563 sec at 091.2 deg PA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Viewed and reported twice before, but never fully split. This time is about as close as a C8 can get to a star a the limit. Both yellow as close. WDS 6th Orbit elements solve to 0.542 sec at 093.2 on 24 June. Measurements from two separate images, 0.574 sec at 093.0 deg PA, close enough for me.
   
 


 
   

 
Bob Hogeveen
Star: Struve 1937, eta Corona Borealis
Date & Time: 28 May 2003
Seeing: 7 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>
Transparency: fair degrading to poor in lower sky
Location of site: Annen, The Netherlands
53ºN, 6ºE
Site classification: Rural with some light domes
Sky darkness: 5 <Limiting magnitude>
Transparency:  <1 worst - 10 best>
Conditions: temp 10 C, damp 
Telescope: C11 on G11
Eyepieces: Pentax SMC XL 40mm, 
Ultima 30mm, TV plossl 20mm, plossl 10mm, LV 5mm
Magnification: 560x, 400x, 280x
 
 

 

I have observed Eta a few times before, last year and this year, and it strikes me how easy it is to split with the C11 when seeing is reasonable. With the predicted separation of 0.55" confirmed by Steve's measurments I am always pleased to see the obvious dark gap between the small airy disks at 560x, although the two disks are surrounded by (parts of) several diffraction rings. This time it was already with 280x that I had a positive indication of the two components, where before I needed 400x. The color of both stars is white.

Another sub-arcsecond double in CrB is Gamma. After the succes on Eta I had a (first ever) look at Gamma.

The separation of Gamma is somewhat larger (0.7"), but the difference in brightness is also larger (3.8 - 5.4). I suppose a DI of these doubles would be about the same. And indeed at 560x Gamma was as nicely split as Eta. The bright primary creating a larger image and the small, more faint secondary sitting close to it, but not touching and showing a yellowish color.
Rating: 2

Ambience: The promise of a clear night before Ascension day was reason to arrange an observingsession in the field with two fellow-observers. On clear, moonless nights I now and then go to a nearby location with a very low and reasonably dark southern horizon. There I try to find all sorts of low objects that are invisible from my home-location.
The location is only a few minutes by car from my home, it's called "Eexterveld" (53-01 N, 06-42E). It's a very high location, at least 15m... and gives a good view on the horizon all around with absolutely NO direct lightsources in view (and that's very special for open locations in this country)!
In the Netherlands we cannot get around some lightdomes in the sky. In this case we have a major lightdome in the west, caused by the small city of Assen, at 15 km's distance. When the sky is real clear and dry the light of Assen causes no real problem, except for objects directly inside the lightdome. 

This night the sky was somewhat disappointing. Besides the fact that we have already entered the grey summer skies at our latitude, it remained hazy in the lower regions and there was a lot of moisture in the air. I had to discard many of the low faint fuzzies on my list. I had hoped to support Steve Bodin with his quest for Double Galaxies but the situation was not good enough for serious observing of the double galaxies that were on my list.

We started the night at 22.00, still early twilight, but a good time to setup comfortably and to admire the new C8 + Vixen GP that one of my fellow-observers recently obtained. This time of evening the calls of a Quail (Coturnix coturnix), nearby in the field, competed with the noise of passing trucks on the provincial road a few miles away and the "roaring" of the motors of a 10" LX200.
Later at night the traffic mostly died down, the quail went to sleep and the ambiance was mainly set by the purring and calling of Snipes (Gallinago gallinago), now and then a cry from a Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) and the roaring motors of the LX200...
We packed up by 02.30, our equipment was dripping wet, the optics dewed up completely and the sky was getting brighter again.
 


 
John M. Ryan
Star: Struve 1937, eta Corona Borealis
Date & Time: 18:O6:03 12:00 local time
Seeing: 6 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>
Transparency: Fair to good
Location of site: Barreras, Salamanca, Spain
Site classification: Rural
Sky darkness: 7 <Limiting magnitude>
Transparency:  <1 worst - 10 best>
Conditions: Temp. 25ºC, Light wind
Telescope: Celestron 9.25" SCT
Eyepieces: none
Magnification: Stella Cam Ex video camera, 
4X Telemate with 2X Zoom for overall of 8X
The video camera is black and white so no color can be noted. This double consists of two components almost equal in magnitude. This double being very close with a separation of under 1 arcsecond was boiling like mad on the laptop screen. I could see the separation at times but the video clip did not give me enough good frames to arrive at an accetable image for measuring. No measurements. I would need a night with better seeing and this shows that my limit for average seeing would be a separation of about 1.25" with the Steve Bodin method and my equipment.


(c) 1998-2003 The Spirit of 33