| Richard Harshaw | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: 6 July, 2001, 03:00 to 04:55, UT Seeing: 8 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Transparency: 6-7/10 ,variable, due to high hazy clouds Location of site: Northern Kansas City, Missouri. 39º 15' N, 94º 30' W, 980 ft above Mean Sea Level Site classification: Suburban Sky darkness: <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: Celestron C-11 Eyepieces: 25mm Plossl, 9mm Lanthanum Magnification: 112x, 311x |
Position: 1849+3401
Magnitudes: 9.66 (F8), 9.85 Sep/PA's: 1.8- / 99- Year of this measurement: 1999 Eyepiece and magnification: 25mm Plossl (112x) and 7.4mm Plossl (378x) Colors noted: W, W Comments: Extremely
difficult; I barely held a black thread between the Airy discs in brief
moments. However, compared to STF 2430 (later in this report), a
star with almost identical separation, I am stumped. STF 2430 was
very easy. Why was this pair so difficult?
|
|||
| Bob Hogeveen | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: July 8, 2001; 0:30 - 01.15 Seeing: 6 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Annen, The Netherlands (53 N, 6 E) Site classification: Village-backyard Sky darkness: 4 <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: Meade SCT 8" f/10 Eyepieces: Ultima 30 mm, TV plossl 20mm, LV 15mm, LV 7mm Magnification: 285x |
Under the given circumstances
this pair is faint an difficult to see. I needed the 7mm (285x) to get
a good view. It was difficult to focus on this faint pair and I used a
more bright star, a few FOV's away, to focus. Nevertheless, I don't understand
why Richard had such problems with this pair. Using the 7mm it was an easy
and rather wide split. It was only the brightness of the sky that was a
problem here, not the separation.
Rating: 4
|
|||
| William Schart | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: July/9/01 0500 to 0635 UT Seeing: 7 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Killeen, TX, USA Site classification: Suburban Sky darkness: 4 <Limiting magnitude> Temperature: In the 80's F (30's C). Slight breeze. Telescope: Celestar 8" SCT Eyepieces: 25mm, 17mm, 10mm Magnification: 80x, 120x, 200x |
A very tight and faint pair,
close to mag 10 for both of them. Not much evidence of duplicity at low
power, elongated at mid power and at high powere I barely but definately
split them.
|
|||
| Philippe Dejocas | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: August 8 2001 Seeing: 7.5 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)> Location of site: Canada Site classification: Suburban Conditions: Clean skies and warm temperatures. Sky darkness: 4.5 <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: 6inch/f5 newt Magnification: 225x
|
That was my first target
this night, having skipped it the first go around, as I knew it would not
yield. This time it almost did at 225x, coming tantalisingly close to a
full split on a number of occasions. In the N field, an optical pair ~
30" - S/SSE; 10¼ / 10½, nicely set in a field of fnt. stars.
W there was a faint pair, maybe 11¼ / 11½, that was glimpsed
at 85x and confirmed at 120x, with ~ the same sep. As the other pair. SES,
at the edge of the field another30"; 10¼ / 10½, but this
time leaning SSW. All in all a nice field deserving a **
|
|||
| Jim Jones | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: 08/17/01 0430 UTC Seeing: 7 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Lake Oswego, Oregon. Site classification: Suburban Conditions: Very pleasant evening. Temp in upper 60's Sky darkness: 4.0 <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: 8" LX50 Eyepieces: 42mm Ultima, 18 mm Radian Magnification: 112x, 224x |
Est PA without inst....ESE
No observable color For some reason I had experienced
some difficulty finding
|
|||
| Otto Piechowski | ||||
| Star:
Hussey 936
Date & Time: 9 PM EDT Saturday, August 18 to 2 AM, Sunday, August 19 Seeing: 8 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Lexington, KY, USA Site classification: Urban area Sky darkness: 4.5 (Zenith Unaided) <Limiting magnitude> Conditions: Clear, a bit of haze, still, c. 65 degrees F, very slight breeze Telescope: 150 mm Maksutov Cassegrain (Intes standard MK 67) Eyepieces: 30 mm ?, 16 mm Rini, 11.4 mm Rini, 7 mm and 4 mm celestron orthos, 5 mm University Optics ortho. Magnification: 360x, 450x |
Just a fuzzy blob at both
360X and 450X. Definitely not a single star, but no resolution
to speak of. May have been caused by a trembling drive.
|
|||