| Bob Hogeveen | ||||
| Star: Burnham 987 A-D Date & Time: 2 September 2004, 23.00 LT Seeing: 8 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)> Transparency: 4 <1 worst - 10 best> Location of site: Annen, The Netherlands 53ºN, 6ºE Site classification: Village backyard Sky darkness: 3 <Limiting magnitude> Conditions: bright moon low in the southeast Telescope: Celestron C11 Eyepieces: Pentax XL 40mm, TV plossl 20mm, Plossl 10mm, LV 7mm Magnification: 70x, 140x, 280x, 400x
|
An interesting case! After the above mentioned splits of 0.8" and 0.9" I aimed the C11 at this pair, full of confidence. But... No secondary seen at the "enormous" distance of 2.6". Long I tried, using different EP's, averted vision and all that, but no star showed up at the appointed location... In the same field another star of mag. 11 was easily visible. Observing the slight haze around BU 687 A and estimating the distance I should think that nothing was in the way of spotting D. What is going on here...? What I did observe was a very faint (mag. 13) star about 10" from A, at a PA of about 90°. Anyone any ideas? |
|||
| Morgan Spangle | ||||
| Star: Burnham 987 A-D Date & Time: 2 September 2004 Seeing: 9 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Transparency: 7 <1-10 Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Purchase, NY Site classification: Suburban Conditions: Very steady seeing and good transparency. A bit of high haze. Sky darkness: <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: Borg 101ED refractor Eyepieces: Tak orthos in a Borg turret: 18mm, 7mm, 5mm, 2.8mm Magnification: 36x, 91x, 128x, 228x |
I
could not pick up the secondary - this could
be a good challenge for Mr. Bodin's setup... |
|||
| Dave Jenkins | ||||
| Star: Burnham 987 A-D Date & Time: 5 Sept, 2004 Seeing: 8 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Transparency: 8 <1-10 Scale (10 best)>. Location of site: Orem, Utah Lat. 40.28 Long. 111.70 Site classification: Bright Suburban Sky darkness: --- <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: C11, Televue 85 Eyepieces: 20mm Magnification: 140x |
No double visible with
either scope at any power. Will have to
try again on another night when
the air is more still. |
|||
| Steve Bodin | ||||
| Star: Burnham 987 A-D Date & Time: 24, 25 Sept 2004, 9 pm to 11 pm local Seeing: 5-6 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)>. Transparency: poorLocation of site: Silverdale WA, USA 47N 123W Site classification: suburb-rural Conditions: temp 55F, damp. Bright moon Sky darkness: 4 <Limiting magnitude> Telescope: Celestron C8 Eyepieces: DX-8263SL color video camera at prime focus, 3x and 6x Magnification: app. 350x,1000x,2000x |
Well
here is a problem, not
only is the star difficult to see due to the magnitude difference, but
the WDS
also has some confusion as to the lettering of the components. Lets try
to make
some sense of it. Firstly, this is a wide binocular double S 752
of equal
magnitude stars separated by 100 seconds and labeled AC in the WDS, but
BU 987
is here the C component!! Then Burnham went and labeled the close
component as
AB, not AC as in our list, and not Cc or CD as it should have been
lettered. So
we have two stars labeled A in this system. Hope the picture that I'll
send to
Luis will help sort this out. Also 2 other faint components were later
labled
Aa and AD but they are not paired to the same star, one for each of the
two A
components!!, comfused yet?? well I am. Measurements, BU 987, the close
difficult one, 2.92 sec at 128.0 deg PA uncertainty of 0.2 sec at 6
degrees; S
752, the wide pair, 106.6 sec at 288.3 deg PA; Aa, Fox 254 paired to S
752 A
component 21.9 sec at 71.9 deg PA; AD, Fox 254 paired to BU 987,
58.1
sec at 295.7 deg PA.![]() |
|||
| Ilario Melandri | ||||
| Star: Burnham 987 A-D Date & Time: 8/10/2004 Seeing: 7 <1-10 Seeing Scale (10 best)> Transparency: <1 worst - 10 best> Location of site: S. Romualdo, Ravenna Italy Site classification: Village backyard Sky darkness: 3.5 <Limiting magnitude> Conditions: 18ºC temp. Telescope: 150mm f/15 refractor Eyepieces: Ortho 9mm Magnification:250x
|
No
secondary visible due to atmospheric conditions.![]() |
|||